Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Theo S.'s avatar

A very interesting read, with thanks for putting together.

A glaring observation from these statistics is that the first two % (tertiary education completion rate & early leavers) unfortunately appear to be completely pointless irl. This seems to be the conclusion that’s drawn (or at least that I drew, correctly or not) from when one takes into account the PISA stat.

While university level education completion rate is a ‘marketable’ metric, the fact that the educational level of 15yo students is low probably means that the standards for university admissibility are also quite low (e.g. if Greek 18yos were ‘competing’ against Esthonian or Japanese 18yos for the same university spots, Greeks would obviously not be admitted - with the first % spiraling down..)

It then stands to reason that the quality of tertiary studies is also not very high either (otherwise we wouldn’t have a high tertiary education completion %..), which if correlated with the underpayment of teachers (albeit I’m not sure whether those stats relate to teaches in secondary education or lower or whether they also capture uni level lecturers) tracks.

In any event, a very interesting read as I said + a very good point in the comments re: ‘frontistiria’ (and a great topic to be explored in and of itself in a Vol. 2 perhaps).

Expand full comment
George Krachtopoulos's avatar

The fact that not many students drop out of their education has to do a lot with culture I believe. At the same time it is healthy for someone to reconsider their options and choose wisely without any pressure, so the low percentage of 4% shouldn't necessarily be appraised. Moreover, as we all know R&D budgets have increased across Europe, without any potential ROI so far. I believe we need to stop and reconsider also where all that (mostly public) money should be allocated instead

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts