Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Antonio Koronios's avatar

I liked a lot the subject and your point of view. A deeper read is needed and, if the universe will allow me I will revert. Meanwhile, I am wondering why in some and not in all reports-metrics, Russia and Turkey are tooked in account?

Expand full comment
Vassilis Serafimakis's avatar

Congratulations on your work - here and in general, from what I'm able to see.

But here is where you go awry. Talking abt the pre-crisis "profligacy":

"...Constant borrowing on a national level, extremely high public sector salaries handed out to partisan ‘clients’ by the Greek political system, as well as various other terrible habits created an unequivocal recipe for disaster."

This is incorrect. When you borrow as a state in your own currency, you cannot default on your state debt unless you want to (for whatever suicidal reason). And Greece, up until 2000, owed in Drachmas, mostly. Now, you are, of course, totally correct about nepotism, corruption, partisanship, etc. Unfortunately, and as it happens, I experienced all that first hand.

But even so, this kind of bad economic policy leads to missing opportunities (to achieve a proper, productive growth, by giving birth to extensive corruption, etc). BUT NOT TO A DEBT CRISIS! Because as a state you owe in the nat'l currency. The solid fact here is that if we, in 2000, had not abandoned our fiscal & monetary independence, i.e. if we had not adopted the Euro as our national currency and bound ourselves by the insane Maastricht limits, we would not have experienced a debt crisis at all.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts